On Being Blog

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask + we'll answer!
  • Get Published on the On Being Blog
Is Our Political Identity Overtaking Our Religious Identity When Choosing a Mate?
by Trent Gilliss, senior editor
Stephanie Coontz’s provocative opinion piece in today’s New York Times touches on some interesting dilemmas facing men and women in modern America. It’s well worth reading and is a fun conversation starter with your spouse and parents. But, it was the above infographic accompanying Coontz’s commentary that caught this editor’s eye.
For the most part, the top five traits that men look for in potential wives have changed very little in 70 years. In 1939, the five most important qualities were:
Dependable character
Emotional stability, maturity
Pleasing disposition
Mutual attraction, love
Good health
And, in 2008:
Mutual attraction, love
Dependable character
Emotional stability, maturity
Education, intelligence
Pleasing disposition
The big mover: education and  intelligence. It climbed from #11 to #4. Good health dropped two positions, and I suspect will plummet further down the list in the coming decades. The romantic in me is heartened to see that love and attraction are sitting atop the field.
For the purposes of this blog, though, the precipitous drop in having a similar religious background and the slight rise in men seeking a woman whose political background is similar to his own is intriguing. It seems men’s personal identities are mirroring our larger cultural identity. As U.S. society has become increasingly divided and hyper-partisan in political terms, men are assigning more value to having a like-minded partner in the political persuasion department. Will this trait continue to rise in importance? I hope not.
Source: “Measuring Mate Preferences: A Replication and Extension” by Christine B. Whelan, University of Pittsburgh, and Christie F. Boxer and Mary Noonan, University of Iowa
Pop-upView Separately

Is Our Political Identity Overtaking Our Religious Identity When Choosing a Mate?

by Trent Gilliss, senior editor

Stephanie Coontz’s provocative opinion piece in today’s New York Times touches on some interesting dilemmas facing men and women in modern America. It’s well worth reading and is a fun conversation starter with your spouse and parents. But, it was the above infographic accompanying Coontz’s commentary that caught this editor’s eye.

For the most part, the top five traits that men look for in potential wives have changed very little in 70 years. In 1939, the five most important qualities were:

  1. Dependable character
  2. Emotional stability, maturity
  3. Pleasing disposition
  4. Mutual attraction, love
  5. Good health

And, in 2008:

  1. Mutual attraction, love
  2. Dependable character
  3. Emotional stability, maturity
  4. Education, intelligence
  5. Pleasing disposition

The big mover: education and intelligence. It climbed from #11 to #4. Good health dropped two positions, and I suspect will plummet further down the list in the coming decades. The romantic in me is heartened to see that love and attraction are sitting atop the field.

For the purposes of this blog, though, the precipitous drop in having a similar religious background and the slight rise in men seeking a woman whose political background is similar to his own is intriguing. It seems men’s personal identities are mirroring our larger cultural identity. As U.S. society has become increasingly divided and hyper-partisan in political terms, men are assigning more value to having a like-minded partner in the political persuasion department. Will this trait continue to rise in importance? I hope not.

Source: “Measuring Mate Preferences: A Replication and Extension” by Christine B. Whelan, University of Pittsburgh, and Christie F. Boxer and Mary Noonan, University of Iowa

    • #Trent Gilliss
    • #infographic
    • #marriage
    • #sex
    • #values
    • #news
  • 3 months ago [Sun, Feb 12th, 2012 at 6:45pm]
  • 39 notes
  • comments
  • Share

39 Notes/ Hide

  1. available03 liked this
  2. aflfootballimages liked this
  3. daughters45go liked this
  4. dakinishir reblogged this from beingblog
  5. missiongroover liked this
  6. bkfiend liked this
  7. marionatrandom liked this
  8. studioschmudio liked this
  9. damnthatshitiswhack liked this
  10. inquies liked this
  11. trentgilliss reblogged this from beingblog
  12. valkaykus reblogged this from beingblog
  13. cristinadls liked this
  14. cristinadls reblogged this from beingblog
  15. musicforthemusicallychallenged liked this
  16. dakinishir liked this
  17. meganooch reblogged this from beingblog
  18. leavemebackstage liked this
  19. theclassiccase reblogged this from seastepp
  20. mjcjla reblogged this from beingblog
  21. outofthedarkness reblogged this from beingblog
  22. sapphireblues liked this
  23. ayocanada liked this
  24. thatbeautifulday liked this
  25. sewzsan liked this
  26. hijinksensued reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    Favorite paragraph:...pretty great article. I didn’t really agree
  27. thinkfreeordiebored reblogged this from beingblog and added:
    would be considered weird back...day given I’d like
  28. mjcjla liked this
  29. atributetoorange liked this
  30. cauldronsofreverb said: maybe the results would be different if they used the word “partner” instead of “wife?” Maybe people have romantic ideas about marriage that don’t necessarily affect how they choose romantic partners (which happens more frequently than marriage??)
  31. allthosewhowonder liked this
  32. restinpeas liked this
  33. coffeecakeicecream reblogged this from beingblog
  34. taylorlorenz liked this
  35. almaswithinalmas liked this
  36. romanova-s reblogged this from beingblog
  37. iamriosuave liked this
  38. iamriosuave reblogged this from beingblog
  39. 3vynn reblogged this from beingblog
  40. beingblog posted this

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
← Previous • Next →

Portrait/Logo

About

On Being with Krista Tippett is a public radio project delving into the human side of news stories + issues. Curated + edited by senior editor Trent Gilliss.

We publish guest contributions. We edit long; we scrapbook. We do big ideas + deep meaning. We answer questions.

We've even won a couple of Webbys + a Peabody Award.

Our Social Spaces

  • @Beingtweets on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • being on Vimeo
  • speakingoffaith on Youtube
  • speakingoffaith on Flickr
  • onbeing on Soundcloud

Following

Posts We Like

  • Photo via newshour

    The sails of the Sydney Opera House are illuminated as part of the Vivid Sydney festival of lights on Friday.

    (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

    Photo via newshour
  • Photo via imgfave
    Photo via imgfave
  • Photo via todaysdocument

    Women munition workers urge President to support suffrage bill. Six women war workers, representing thousands of others, were delegated to see...

    Photo via todaysdocument
  • Photo via themorningnews

    In her teens she questioned this view of her father and confronted her mother. Nazi descendants struggle with family history and social stigma.

    Photo via themorningnews
See more →
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask + we'll answer!
  • Get Published on the On Being Blog
  • Mobile

American Public Media. Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr